Boris,
You and I do not need to understand the particle physics of cellular
microbiology in order to study an introductory text of biology.  And in
order to learn what the text is presenting, we do not need to reduce
everything mentioned in the text to the order of particle physics.

So while I agree that we need to go to the basis of knowledge to resolve
some scalability issues, and derived knowledge is often based on raw
sensory experience, the point that I am trying to make is that the basis of
knowledge that we have to use in many scalability scenarios are not raw
sensory experience.

For example, to really understand what is presented in the biology text we
do not need to recall the sensory experience of reading.  (I guess it would
be nice to be able to do that but it is not necessary for the problem
of learning to understand what the text referred to.) So we really do not
need to reduce all problems to primitive forms.

Also, some scalability issues cannot be resolved just by having the
foundations of the subject (or object) handy.  The potential complexity of
interrelations (as in derivable interrelations) may make scalability
infeasible.

Jim Bromer



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to