Damn.
Approximately 2^(n^2)-2^(2n) - n as n increases?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Approximately 2^(n^2)-2^(2n)-log(2)n as n increases?
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2^(n^2)-2^(2n)-log(e)n as n increases approximately? (That is just a
>> guess. Something about the proportion of primes since the primes won't
>> be detected.)
>> Maybe.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> That last messaged contained another error.
>>> There are 2^(n^2) possible ways to fill the n^2 bits of the partial
>>> products but there are 2^(2n) possible ways to do it with a
>>> well-formed set (given a nXn bit multiplier). So the worse case is
>>> that I might have to go through would be 2^(n^2)-2^(2n) trials before
>>> I found a system that represented a number that could be factored. So
>>> the conclusion is the same.
>>> I think that is right - or at least it is getting closer to the ballpark.
>>> Jim Bromer
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Ok the wheels are slipping but train is slowly getting up to steam.
>>>>
>>>> How many possible ways are there to set up the n^2 bits of the partial
>>>> products?  2^(n^2).  Only n^2 are well-formed.  (This is for a nXn
>>>> multiplication algorithm). So even if I had the dreamed of polynomial
>>>> time solution to Boolean Satisfiabiity the worse case is that I might
>>>> have to go through 2^(n^2)-n^2 trials before I got a factorization.
>>>>
>>>> So even though you do not have to make the multiplication algorithm
>>>> reversible in order to derive a Boolean Formula that will detect a
>>>> non-prime number (given a set of possible partial products), if the
>>>> goal is to use the method with a polynomial time solution to Boolean
>>>> Satisfiabilty then you are going to have to make it reversible (or
>>>> something like that) if you are want to use it to find a factorization
>>>> solution to any given number in polynomial time.
>>>>
>>>> Jim Bromer
>>>> (I might be wrong...It has happened. I admit it.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Unfortunately I was wrong about this, but the method does have a flaw.
>>>>>
>>>>> The partial products are fully specified in the sense that they detail
>>>>> the relationships between each bit as it is used in the cross-products
>>>>> in a consistent manner based on the bits of the multiplicand.  So if
>>>>> you had a Boolean Solver then the Boolean formula of the cross
>>>>> products (derived from a standard multiplication algorithm) could be
>>>>> used to determine if there was a solution for a given system of
>>>>> cross-products.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, if the system detected that there was no solution to a
>>>>> problem (given a system of partial products) it would not definitely
>>>>> represent a prime number since the given system could be poorly
>>>>> formed.  On the other hand it should be able to detect a
>>>>> factorization.  If it found that a system could be factored based on
>>>>> the fact that there was a solution to the Boolean Formula, then the
>>>>> given system of partial products could be added to detect the number
>>>>> that can be factored.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Bromer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I was really surprised when I discovered that converting the
>>>>>> cross-products, used to determine the partial products, of a binary
>>>>>> multiplication into the form of Boolean logic was logically simple.
>>>>>> It turns out that the methodology of the multiplication problem, when
>>>>>> you are given the multiplicands is simple just as the multiplication
>>>>>> algorithm is simple.  However, if you were to try to work backwards to
>>>>>> use the partial products to try to determine the multiplicands the
>>>>>> problem is much more difficult.  It is simple as long as poorly formed
>>>>>> partial products have been filtered out beforehand.  The formalization
>>>>>> of the problem, (expressed in pure Boolean form), is not quite so
>>>>>> simple if the algorithm is supposed to detect or avoid poorly formed
>>>>>> partial products.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It took me a long time to figure this out so I won't be calling any of
>>>>>> the other boys in this group slow anytime soon.  So anyway, if you
>>>>>> wanted to use the multiplication algorithm as a factorization
>>>>>> algorithm you would have to work the algorithm backwards in order to
>>>>>> determine the multiplicands given the product, or to determine the
>>>>>> multiplicands given a system of partial products.  The use of the
>>>>>> partial products as the given isn't simple because if a bit in a
>>>>>> partial product = 0 it could be because the corresponding bits in one
>>>>>> or both of the multiplicands that produced the cross product were 0.
>>>>>> That shows that there are three ways to explain a bit in a cross
>>>>>> product that equals 0.  On the other hand if the bit in the cross
>>>>>> product was 1 then we would know that both bits were 1, which shows
>>>>>> that there should be a reasonably "easy" way to define the Boolean
>>>>>> Logic of the partial products so that it would only allow correctly
>>>>>> formed partial products to get past the Boolean Formula.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This reasoning shows how complicated turning an algorithm into a true
>>>>>> Boolean Formula can be.  First we start off with the standard
>>>>>> multiplication algorithm, ok. But if you want to use that algorithm in
>>>>>> an unconventional way, you have to make sure that the implicit
>>>>>> relations are well-formed in the sense that the unconventional usage
>>>>>> will not present the given values in an unacceptable poorly-formed
>>>>>> way.  So even if you want to consider the problem in purely abstract
>>>>>> way -using only Boolean variables- you have to be prepared for
>>>>>> unexpected effects when your claim jumps the conventional rails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to take the conversion of a multiplication function into a
>>>>>> pure (variable) Boolean form and then use it to detect a factorization
>>>>>> given a solution to the derived Boolean Formula, the multiplication
>>>>>> method would first have to be expressed as a reversible function.
>>>>>> Jim Bromer


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to