Reverse engineering the neurons first.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Sergio Pissanetzky <[email protected]
> wrote:

>  The bottom-up approach being what?****
>
> ** **
>
> Sergio****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:10 AM
>
> *To:* AGI
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] LM741****
>
>  ** **
>
> I have no doubt that *eventually* they will get to that. (Numenta's
> technology is one approach to that -- not that it necessarily works, since
> I haven't personally used it, but failures are usually encountered on the
> road to success.) But because of the potentially long road ahead for such
> research, and likely much wasted time dealing with what I would call the
> "operating system" of the brain as opposed to the important parts of the
> "program", I find it more probable that the top-down approach to reverse
> engineering the mind will beat the bottom-up approach to the punch.
>
>
> ****
>  ------------------------------
>
> On Aug 29, 2012 8:39 AM, Mike Tintner <[email protected]> wrote: **
> **
>
> Surely, the key thing is we still don’t understand the ‘engram’ – how
> information is laid down in neurons (or elsewhere).- the very foundation of
> how the brain works.****
>
>  ****
>
> Without that, it’s hard to see any neuron-based approach to AGI as other
> than mad, no?****
>
>  ****
>
> In general, whenever s.o. talks of a “science-based” approach to AGI, it’s
> b.s.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] ****
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:56 PM****
>
> *To:* AGI <[email protected]> ****
>
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] LM741****
>
>  ****
>
> You said: I don't see how mastery of the neuron will help anyone towards
> AGI.
>
> It's called reverse engineering. You have to start somewhere. It seems
> obvious that the best places to start are with what are most readily
> visible: either the top-level behavior, or the bottom-level components. I
> prefer starting from the top, as do you apparently, but there's no reason
> to assume they aren't working on exactly the same problem as us, regardless
> of what you think of their egos. (Your argument that they must have huge
> egos applies equally as well to everyone else on this list, including you
> and me.)
>
> Numenta is a good example of how understanding neurons could lead to AGI
> (and is therefore a relevant subject for AGI-related lists like this one),
> even though they've got a long way to go and a lot of improvement to make.
>
>
>
>
> ****
>  ------------------------------
>
> On Aug 29, 2012 4:29 AM, Anastasios Tsiolakidis <[email protected]>
> wrote: ****
>
> On 29/08/2012, at 10.52, Ian W Eberhart <[email protected]> wrote:***
> *
>
>  ****
>
>  Anastasios, I don't think you've actually said anything yet, ****
>
>   ****
>
> A blessing in disguise! What I have said in the general sense, on and off
> the list, is that I would like to see a tight AGI focus, ie if the answer
> to a question is not seen as critical to AGI then we should keep it for
> another forum. Specifically I don't see how mastery of the neuron will help
> anyone towards AGI. The same could be said about LM741' unless someone is
> seriously considering stringing together a few billion of them
>
> ****
>
> so it seems a little rough to accuse someone of egotism when all they are
> trying to do ****
>
>  ****
>
> Let's be clear about one thing, it takes a huge ego to work with anything
> intelligence related. I scolded the fuck and other miscelania. And I do
> have a pet peeve towards neurodudes and dudettes who tell me how amazingly
> many things they know and prove, they can share their glories with all the
> worlds autistic, dyslexic, blind, deaf, bipolar, Alzheimer's  etc sufferers.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> AT****
>
>  ****
>
>     <http://www.listbox.com/>****
>
>   *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-bcb45fb4>| 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> ****
>
> <http://www.listbox.com/>****
>
> ** **
>
> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5>| 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> ****
>
> <http://www.listbox.com/>****
>
> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-bcb45fb4>| 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> ****
>
> <http://www.listbox.com/>****
>
> ** **
>
> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/18883996-f0d58d57>| 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> ****
>
> <http://www.listbox.com/>****
>
> ** **
>   *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-bcb45fb4> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com/>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to