My point was that it is damn near impossible to even make a case for > designing in emergent properties. > > *How would YOU do such a thing*, other than just trying zillions of > semi-random experiments? >
Via theoretical understanding of the type of system one is building... > > Have you thought about a GA "supervisor" for OpenCog, to replace current > developers?!!! If the prospect of an OpenCog-descendant AGI is workable > (you already know my opinion), this might provide your only realistic shot > at it. As in the previous paragraph, you will first need the measure for > intelligence as part of this. > Currently, automated program learning works OK for LISP programs containing up to a few dozen nodes in their corresponding program trees. That's way too small to use GP or any other automated program learning methods to evolve AGIs. One would need an AGI evolutionary program learning system, to evolve programs big enough to be AGIs ;) -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
