On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Piaget Modeler
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Wouldn't that be called adaptation with the goal of survival and
> reproduction?
>
> Obviously these entries of mine don't fall under the banner "invention",
rather "principles and priorities". Despite mentioning reproduction in my
post, it was really all about survival. I have already preached long and
hard that solitary AGI, though technically possible, makes little sense to
me, and of course reproduction by genetic material takes AGI embeddedness
to a whole new level - just imagine Einstein trying to reproduce in the
absence of females! Reproduction is the ultimate adaptation, though it
happens in a way that is not entirely ego- and algo- satisfying, neither
can you take your qualia and "life" with you to your offspring, nor are you
guaranteed they will be your allies.

There are are several (infinite perhaps) non-reproductive adaptations, such
as symbiosis and specifically domestication. We generally think we created
sheep, dogs, pigs and cows, but we could easily have been created by them
too with their diseases and our ability to work with them giving
reproductive and survival advantages of the appropriate magnitude. There is
always going to be the thin and risky line between nature and nurture too,
never really knowing what the consequences of either is.

So, RiskAI prioritizes risk modeling at the nurture side, leaving nature to
"take its course" with reproduction and other genetic (perhaps random)
adaptations.

AT



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to