Piaget used scheme, schemes, schema, schemata interchangeably. It's like being given the answers before the question. So the page has pieces of the puzzle I suppose. The commentary is coming, all will be revealed in due time. Requirement #1: The immediate goal is to build an PREMISE language interpreter which relies upon a persistent discrimination net. Facts entered are stored in secondary storage. Think of it as a fact-base. Requirement #2: Queries can be stored along with the facts. Requirement #3: There are two kinds of queries, exact (equality based) and inexact (similarity based). The reasons for these requirements are based on other requirements, and will become self evidentonce you start thinking about it. Does that help? From: [email protected] Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:30:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [agi] Scheme Memory To: [email protected]
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> wrote: Your thoughts are welcome.... https://www.facebook.com/SchemeMemory Well, to have my thoughts you'd probably need to add a little commentary to that page, commentary that tells a story of sorts. I've read a couple of those articles and I wasn't able to tell myself a story that these representations play some significant role in my AGI plans. Since when are scheme and schema synonyms anyway? AT AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
