PM: * What do they think about defining basic concepts as types of the recognition and action procedures of an agent?
What does he mean? Could mean a lot of things. Any relation to Barsalou’s ideas? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:34:07 +0100 Subject: Re: FW: [agi] Steve's placement/payload theory of language From: Roland Hausser To: [email protected] Hello Michael, Thank you very much for your email. I read the comments by Jim Bromer and Steve Richfield with great interest. They lead me to the following questions: * Are their respective approaches sign-oriented or agent-oriented? * What do they think about defining basic concepts as types of the recognition and action procedures of an agent? * How about reusing these basic concepts as the literal meanings of a language? Happy Easter to you! Looking forward to be reading from you, Best regards, Roland Hausser AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
