Alan,
Well I will take the reasonable parts of the criticisms to try to make the
final copy a little more readable.

As far as it is probably more drivel I can say that I am often very
skeptical of the viability of the subjects under discussion in this group
but I always got the feeling that the discussion of unproven theories about
AGI is kind of like the real purpose of the discussion group.

I am one of the few posters in this group (the only poster in this group?)
who acknowledges that his ideas might not work.  And if they don't then
this might be a lot of drivel.  It might on the other hand be a theory,
which, as Steve suggests, might be viable 50 years ago.  However, if I
can't get my ideas to work in some limited form within a reasonable amount
of time then it will strongly suggest that they would not be viable without
a lot of fix-ups even 50 years from now. But if there is something viable
in these ideas I should be able to get some kind of demo within a couple of
years.  It would be limited, what I call AGi.

Jim Bromer


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> wrote:

> [META],
>
> I stopped trying to read the original posting because it didn't use a
> convenient paragraph structure and because it used some kind of font
> override that made the text two points smaller than what I'm accustomed to.
> Furthermore, it shifted the color to a blue-ish hue which comes out rather
> blurry on my monitor (yes, I paid $400 for a 19" 4:3 monitor, it is top of
> the line).
>
> So no, I'm not going to read it because I feel insulted by it that I
> should be expected to expend extra effort to parse it when, in all
> likeleyhood it is just more drivel. =| Normally formatted quoted text is
> shown for comparison's sake.
>
>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to