There are no algos that create patchworks. There are no algos that can do AGI. All the would-be such algos, e.g. Hofstadter's font prog, create only patterns and are always a disappointment, like the whole history of would-be AGI.
Patchworks demonstrably generate ever new parts. Patterns and algos don't and can't produce a single new part. Not one. Not one single new part. You clearly can't see - or don't believe - the difference. I think we should stop. On 4 September 2013 15:04, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, tintner michael > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can *you* see the diff. between patterns/patchworks? > > > Yes I am aware of your use of the terms, but I am also aware that > mathematical algorithms that are based on algorithms that produce > identical patterns can be used to create "patchworks". That does not > mean that there is a patchwork pattern for every different pattern > that might be observed. Jim Bromer > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5 > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
