Well I hadn't heard that the great *majority* of research is considered
untrustworthy - and I don't recall our discussions here pointing that up.
Some yes, the majority no.

And that's clearly why the N Scientist is making this its lead article today


On 19 October 2013 22:57, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mike,
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, tintner michael <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Worth reading lead article this week's New Scientist -claims that the
>> great majority of neuroscientific research is untrustworthy - while hoping
>> that this may lead to a new more solid stage of research.
>>
>
> This is the oldest of news - more than half a century. One side want solid
> reproducible results, the other side says that this isn't possible, so
> let's publish SOMETHING.
>
> There is a LOT that is below the threshold of publication, that you can
> learn by working with others in a wet lab. I did this, and heard things ~40
> years ago that are must now being "discovered", along with much more that
> has yet to be "discovered".
>
> This can ONLY happen with MUCH better equipment. My microscope proposal is
> clearly supportive of this goal. Until then, we seem to be stuck with the
> status quo.
>
> BTW, SOMEONE should publish a book of neuroscientific suspicions. It would
> be hard to find a researcher who couldn't add something to such a book.
> THIS could guide machine learning MUCH better than current published
> neuroscientific research.
>
> Steve
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5> | 
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to