That's because the text "or the turn-the-crank product of successful formal methods" is in your ideas summary not because anyone would think you're a crank or anything. Though coincidentally if you search on "Jim Bromer" "inaccurate theories" it narrows it down to only one result :)
John -----Original Message----- From: Jim Bromer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:38 PM To: AGI Subject: [agi] "Jim Bromer" crank I put "Jim Bromer" crank in Bing and it came up with these two links: Re: [agi] Summary of My Current Theory For an AGI Program ... weyounet.info/2013/04/re-agi-summary-of-my-current-theory-for-an... Summary of My Current Theories for an AGI Program. www.jimbromer.com/SummaryOfMyCurrentIdeasAboutAGI.html So it looks like my critics must have been right... :( Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-3b178a58 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
