I agree with this blog post ( DeepFace ... Linda Lovelace ;). Obviously, too, people are using recent hipper sounding jargon, like "deep," everything is deep, although chaining neural networks together is as old as the hills... and also one hears "cognitive computing," and the ever present optimistic phrase "our software 'understands'" -- always without defining what "understand" even means. But I think what we are seeing is "passing the Turing test in a limited way," which is the same as saying not passing the Turing test...
On 3/22/14, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote: > I summarized some of the points from my recent emails on this topic in > a blog post, > > http://multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.hk/2014/03/lessons-from-deep-mind-vicarious.html > > > ;) > ben > > -- > Ben Goertzel, PhD > http://goertzel.org > > "In an insane world, the sane man must appear to be insane". -- Capt. > James T. Kirk > > "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery / None but ourselves can free > our minds" -- Robert Nesta Marley > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
