On 3/6/15, Steve Richfield via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems obvious (to) me that any envisioned super duper AGI of the future > would be easily able to win a reverse Turing competition - demonstrating > with advanced logical solutions to difficult problems that it is a machine > and NOT merely human. >
In college I once saw a guy kick a hole in a wall because his program wouldn't work. If the test causes somebody to kick a hole in the wall, that would win the test (proof of being a machine). Just kidding around. I see your point, though. For a long time I have thought that there is no real need for a machine to seem like a human. Personally, I want to know if I am talking to a machine or not. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
