I got the paper it was just a browser bug.
Jim Bromer

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the link to Ahmed and Hawkins' paper on sparse distributed
> representation as it relates to HTM. It is interesting but it is
> taking me some time to read it. I also have started the white paper on
> HTM. I have seen that before but I never read it very carefully.
> I always thought that any kind of conceptual vector system (like a
> semantic vector system) would have to be n-dimensional and that it
> really would not map well to three dimensions. And if you wanted to
> use a simple vector to represent every basic concept (or every basic
> concept zone) then it would have to be a really big vector which would
> be, for the most part, blank. So the idea of a SDR does appeal to me.
> I am skeptical of the idea that, 'since the HTM is based on
> neuro-science then getting it to work is just a matter of finding the
> right application details' intuition. If HTM is a good model then it
> would be, at best, a crude model of a detail of the mind. However, it
> is an interesting concept and it does seem to be based on neural
> networks which have shown some effectiveness and it does seem feasible
> that it could be effective in certain areas like reconstructing an
> appropriate reaction to a kind of input based on partial inputs. This,
> for example, would be more feasible for a temporal stream of input
> where the interference is scattered across each 'frame' of the input.
> (I think research into aspects of the theory, like this one, might be
> worthwhile even for a skeptic.)
>
> I haven't seen how it uses the characteristics of combinatorics that
> you mentioned.
> I just lost access to the pdf of the paper for some reason. (Cornell
> is either on to me or they are doing something.)
> Jim Bromer
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Matt Lind <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Jim:
>>
>> Agree. An interesting concept in this regard is SDR (sparse distributed
>> representation) which heavily relies on those characteristics of
>> combinatorics. Numenta's HTM (hierarchical temporary memory) framework uses
>> SDRs to model the brain's internal communication language. Interesting read:
>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07469
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> 发自我的iPhone
>>
>>
>> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
>> 发件人: Jim Bromer <[email protected]>
>> 发送时间: 2015年06月09日 02:50
>> 收件人: AGI <[email protected]>
>> 主题: [agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI
>>
>> I have not been that interested in combinatorics, graph theory,
>> weighted reasoning, Bayesian methods and so on because I felt that
>> these were all logic based and that the simplest way to develop an AGI
>> application would be to stick to basics and only use simple forms of
>> these methods if I needed them. I believed that there are certain
>> discreet obstacles to advancing AGI at this time and solutions to
>> these problems really needed to be found before any substantial
>> advances could be made. However, now that I am starting to appreciate
>> how combinatorics can help with discreet based systems and may even be
>> essential to using logic effectively, I am, unsurprisingly, changing
>> my view about this.
>>
>> So I recommend that anyone in this group who feels as I felt should
>> start brushing up on combinatorics, graph theory and so on.
>>
>> Many of us know that computers are good at working with narrow results
>> and this has produced major advances in ‘narrow AI’. Developers who
>> worked with probability reasoning thought that their methods should be
>> sufficient to overcome the narrow AI dilemma, but I haven’t seen that.
>> (I do appreciate the many advances that AI has made and I do not
>> totally accept the narrow AI dismissal, but on the other hand I am
>> still amazed that AI programs do not seem to exhibit the ability to
>> learn even in the simple ways that we would expect from toddlers.)
>>
>> So why are combinatorics so important for discrete symbolic AGI? Using
>> logic as an example of a tightly defined discrete system, you can see
>> that multiple solutions can be held in a tightly compressed formula
>> string.  What is more, subclasses of these different solutions can
>> often be derived from a portion of the formula or from a simple
>> analysis and rearrangement using portions of the formula.
>> Combinatorics is one way we can get to this logical multiplicity as it
>> may relate to logical sub-relations.  Right now these methods are
>> limited but there is no reason to expect that this method will be
>> stuck with its current limitations.
>> Jim Bromer
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> AGI
>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/27149679-a7635131
>> Modify Your Subscription:
>> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to