Miles,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Dr Miles Dyson <
[email protected]> wrote:

> One reason against is that Worldcomp hides their proceedings behind
> paywalls
> "http://www.world-academy-of-science.org/worldcomp15/ws/publications";
>

Badly written, but they DO keep all papers on their server. My old papers
are there, e.g.:

http://www.worldcomp-proceedings.com/proc/p2011/CDE2890.pdf

which presents the only candidate I know of for a prospective platform on
which to implement AGI.

However, they DO have agreements with various publishers to allow slightly
modified versions to be published behind paywalls, provided the title,
abstract, and first page are significantly changed. When I first heard
about this I thought it was some sort of plot to violate copyrights and
went to the Chairman of WORLDCOMP, but everyone knew what everyone else was
doing and he was OK with it. Anyway, this 2nd step is entirely optional and
is NOT part of the conferences.

My point is that I can barely afford to go to one conference a year, so I
go to the one that has rolled 20 conferences all rolled together.
Apparently many other AGIers are in the same situation, so joining with
WORLDCOMP would GREATLY improve everyone's exposure to both AGI and non-AGI
technologies.

One continuing delight at the AI conferences are the Russians working on
the Russian Translator, to provide good bidirectional translations to
English and other languages. They have been digging deeply into many
approaches.

Steve
===============================

>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Steve Richfield <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am at WORLDCOMP this week. I attended a panel entitled "Virtual
>> Intelligence vs. Artificial Intelligence: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly"
>> today. This apparently also occurred at last year's WORLDCOMP, but I didn't
>> attend last year.
>>
>> By Artificial Intelligence they were referring to AGI. By Virtual
>> Intelligence they were referring to weak AI. The discussions were
>> reminiscent of early discussions here on the AGI forum, so having been
>> through years of this stuff on this forum, I was the shining light in this
>> discussion. Yea, I know, I am a poor advocate for AGI, but I did what I
>> could, pointing out this forum, Novamente, etc., etc.
>>
>> WORLDCOMP is THE biggest multi-disciplinary computer-related conference
>> in the world - but there is no AGI representation there. Someone should
>> wake up and submit a paper that brings AGI to WORLDCOMP and to the world,
>> e.g. explaining Novamente, et al.
>>
>> Another possibility might be to put the AGI conference under the
>> WORLDCOMP umbrella, as 20 other conferences have already done.
>>
>> I am NOT a passionate promoter of AGI, but I think the interests of
>> everyone associated with AGI would be advanced if AGI could at least be
>> well represented at WORLDCOMP.
>>
>> If someone (like YOU Ben) wants to step forward and close this gap, I
>> have all of the contact information needed to make this happen.
>>
>> Any interest?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> |
>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>
>
> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac> |
> Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-- 
Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six
hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full
employment.



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to