Steve,
Congrats on the patent, and this is a good read. At first I was skeptical but it’s very interesting. Here’s a thought: Take this design, the techniques you have and replace/add a short wavelength vibrational scanner with cymatic pattern analysis. Basically induce/scan across vibrational frequencies while computationally detecting molecular cymatic pattern emission and position. And potentially integrate the two techniques so there would be cymatic + fluorescence analysis. Naturally some vibrational frequencies will be destructive so those you can hit those during latter scans. Just as some particle bombardment is degrading. Depends on the payoff I guess, what sweet spot frequencies produce best emission data for a scanning strategy. Thinking further... what really would be inventive would be a "scope" that sees backward in time. 2 options. One that really can see back in time, which would require some new engineering physics, and one that looks back in time computationally, being in some ways similar to prediction into the future. Generally the more intelligence involved the faster and more accurate looking backwards in time is. Human agents only see so accurately into the past and future. We do see farther collectively. A defining aspect and a way perhaps to measure our intelligent minds as engines is the efficiency we have to see into the past, to look at a forest for example and reconstruct it backwards in time comparing it to the actual. A super omni-intelligence, whatever that is, would be able to see perfectly all the way into the past "losslessly". We just have in our imaginational "scope" a short term jpeg-like compression view into the past. What makes us human though and not gods is the limited computational ability of our minds or the… inability to tesseract the Hamming distance or,.. engage a reverse-entropy lens :) John From: Steve Richfield [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 3:06 AM To: AGI <[email protected]> Subject: [agi] Another Patent Celebration... Hi all, I just got word that the patent for my super duper microscope for diagramming brains now has a number - 9,229,213. This won't be official until January 5th, but you heard it first here. For those who want a sneak peek, I put up a small web site for it at: http://CoincidentFocus.weebly.com AGIers should look at the patent application and NOT the hype on the web site. To do this, click on the [Link to Patent] box at the bottom of the page. Maybe with some real INFORMATION, everyone here can stop wild guessing how we work and get down to the serious business of implementing true intelligence. Now, I need a CEO to turn this into gigabucks and true AGI. Any takers? Steve AGI | <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-82d9122f> | <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Modify Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
