James Rogers wrote: > Obviously this is something of an oversimplification; I think I see your > point. There is still a halting problem, just not a practical halting > problem for most intents and purposes. Or at least it has been > pushed to a > level of abstraction where we don't really worry about it too much.
OK, I'm happier with that formulation. thanks ;-) > > No practical result will emerge from infinite computation, and > our machinery > doesn't like to do infinite computation anyway (but will happily make > approximations). Yep, gotcha. ben ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
