> If this physical interpretation of the Church-Turing thesis > is accepted then it follows that if the physical brain and its > operation is a "well defined process" then it must be possible > to implement the process that the brain carries out on a Turing > machine. This is the claim of "Strong AI." > > Does that sounds correct to people? > > Cheers > Shane
Yeah, that's correct. And the statement that brain-dynamics is a well-defined process is generally assumed to follow from physics... Ben G ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
