> Maybe the representation of Cyc can be used. They use some form > of predicate logic too, and they made a point that it is the > same form as those mathematicians use.
CycL is a lot more awkward than SUO-KIF, which is why the latter was adopted as a standard... > Personally, I think "what's interesting" is a cognitive thing, > ie you cannot tell what's interesting from low-level processing > alone. But there may be some amount of it in the intermediate > stages. There's definitely some novelty-detection on the perceptual level... > During *learning*, communication among ALL layers would still > be necessary. But I generally agree on the layered structure. > OK agreed... Ben ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
