On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:43PM -0400, Daniel Holt wrote: > Heh... I guess it'd also be a lot easier to get rid of some of your > fancy algorithms and complex math and stuff, and you could quickly use > your computer to build a rapid adding machine... ;) > > Imagine the possibilities! > > D. > > Ben Goertzel wrote: > > > > >Of course there is no way to get rid of recursion, that's very silly!!! > > > >In the language of Gregory Bateson (see his book "Mind and Nature"), > >you're suggesting to do away with "learning how to learn" --- which is > >not at all a workable idea for AGI.
Learning to evolve by evolution is sure a workable idea. It's also sufficient for an AGI: look into the mirror. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
