On 5/30/06, Yan King Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that your approach is to store the function "add(x,y)" directly
*inside* a node. This destroys the nice uniformity of the KR. Secondly,
the AGI should be able to process addition just like ANY other concept.
"add(x,y)" is inside a node and therefore requires special processing (not
AGI!).
You are placing your aesthetic preferences for how an AGI "should"
work over the data regarding how real intelligences do work.
Knowledge clearly becomes proceduralized and inaccessible to reasoning
with use.
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
