> If we want to increase content and get more people interested I think
> the best thing to devote our time and effort to is a wiki rather than
> a forum. Threads have little chance of staying on topic and finding
> things in them as they meander around becomes nightmarish.
>
> As we can't present a definitive answer to what is intelligence the
> best we can do is try and classify the various possible answers to
> questions around intelligence so that people can see the different
> views and the projects/people that are working/thinking in that
> direction.
>
> A bit like this
>
> http://www.macrovu.com/CCTGeneralInfo.html
>
> But in wiki form and not so focused on the ambiguous term "think".
>
> I expect we will get a variety of different classifications of
> approaches, from the logic based strong self-improvers to those that
> fastidiously copy the current knowledge of a human brain.
>
> People can then find the projects/people they are interested in and
> read their back postings on this list.
> the best thing to devote our time and effort to is a wiki rather than
> a forum. Threads have little chance of staying on topic and finding
> things in them as they meander around becomes nightmarish.
>
> As we can't present a definitive answer to what is intelligence the
> best we can do is try and classify the various possible answers to
> questions around intelligence so that people can see the different
> views and the projects/people that are working/thinking in that
> direction.
>
> A bit like this
>
> http://www.macrovu.com/CCTGeneralInfo.html
>
> But in wiki form and not so focused on the ambiguous term "think".
>
> I expect we will get a variety of different classifications of
> approaches, from the logic based strong self-improvers to those that
> fastidiously copy the current knowledge of a human brain.
>
> People can then find the projects/people they are interested in and
> read their back postings on this list.
Will,
I've been thinking of hosting a wiki for some time, but not sure if we have reached critical mass here.
When we get down to the details, people's views may diverge even further. I can think of some potential points of disagreement:
0. what's the overall AGI architecture?
1. neurally based or logic based?
2. what's the view on Friendliness?
3. initially, self-improving or static?
4. open source or not?
5. commercial or not?
May be we can set up a simple poll place to see who agrees with whom??
YKY
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
