On 11/28/06, Mike Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
perhaps my view of a hypersurface is wrong, but wouldn't a subset of the
dimensions associated with an object be the physical dimensions? (ok, virtual physical dimensions)
Is "On" determined by a point of contact between two objects? (A is on B
and B is on A)
Or is there a dependancy on the direction of gravity? (A is on B, but B is
on the floor)
You say that "on" could not be learned - why not? In this case it would
seem that the meaning would effectively be "cultural" and the meaning would depend on the semantic usage/intent of the tutors.. I'm talking about a system whose objects are points in a hyper feature-space, the features are sensor values, for example pixels of the camera. This is not the same as physical space which is (3+1)D. Maybe we arn't talking about the same thing. Anyway, by using predicate logic I have made some bold simplifications and the resulting system is still not easy to build. Anything fancier than that could only be harder. I think we need to keep it simple. YY ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
