On 12/1/06, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The questions you asked above are predicated on a goal stack approach.
You are repeating the same mistakes that I already dealt with.
Philip Goetz snidely responded
Some people would call it "repeating the same mistakes I already dealt
with".
Some people would call it "continuing to disagree". :)
Richard's point was that the poster was simply repeating previous points
without responding to Richard's arguments. Responsible "contining to
disagree" would have included, at least, acknowledging and responding to or
arguing with Richard's points. Not doing so is simply an "is too/is not"
argument.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
