--- Hank Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/1/06, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- Hank Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 12/1/06, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I suppose the alternative is to not scan brains, but then you still > > have > > > > death, disease and suffering. I'm sorry it is not a happy picture > > either > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > Or you have no death, disease, or suffering, but not wireheading. > > > > How do you propose to reduce the human mortality rate from 100%? > > > Why do you ask?
You seemed to imply you knew an alternative to brain scanning, or did I misunderstand? -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
