This is a better link from the company that I found by Googling "nanosyntax": http://nanosyntax.com/
The basic idea is that word senses are not atomic but are composed of something more primitive whose sentence-distributed structure is called nanosyntax. As I am about to write a parser using a reversible Construction Grammar the idea is interesting to keep in mind. My grammar will be a controlled subset of English for the purpose of behavior acquisition. It is a reversible grammar because I want to use the same objects for natural language understanding as well as for natural language generation. I recently completed the import of WordNet into the texai knowledge base whose starting point was the context of OpenCyc, see http://sf.net/projects/texai for the Java source code. -Steve --- Jiri Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "A company in Israel claims to have solved the > problem of enabling computers > to parse natural human language" > > http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6184618910.html > > Regards, > Jiri Jelinek > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: > http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303 > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
