The choice of knowledge representation language makes a huge difference.

IMO, Cyc committed themselves to an overcomplicated representation
language that has rendered their DB far less useful than it would be
otherwise....

If you want to use Lojban or Lojban++ as a knowledge representation,
then I will back your project strongly, as careful study convinced me
that the Lojban style of representation makes a lot of sense...

-- Ben

On 1/13/07, YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 1/14/07, Chuck Esterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * What do you feel the pros and cons are vs. Cyc?

Officially, Cyc is intended as an ontology, not a repository of facts.
Although in ResearchCyc they have additional facts.  If possible, we
may incoporate Cyc's knowledge, perhaps by licensing with them.

I think the main difference is that we make this open to the public.

> * How will the system deal with the fact that a bird with broken wings
> cannot fly? Should the statement be augmented, a new statement
> introduced, or all statements to be understood as "usually, but not
> guaranteed"? Or something else?

Yes, the fact "birds can fly" would be marked as *defeasible*.  Which is
different from tautologies such as modus ponens or exclusion of the middle.

> * Would the system explicitly capture probability? "Most personal
> computers have hard drives."

Yes, that can be done too, eg "50% of marriages end in divorce."  But not
many facts have probabilities available, especially as a public consensus.
If not, they can be marked simply as defeasible.

> * Would it support separate domains/modules?

Initially it should be a single common sense body of knowledge.  Later,
perhaps we'll make special domains.

> * Technically speaking, what's the format? Custom text. XML. Maybe via
> HTTP RPC. Live SQL database. Something else.

Not sure yet.  XML seems a good choice.  It depends on whether we use FOL or
lojban etc.

> * What do you feel the most direct applications are for this new
> repository? (If the same as Cyc, it would suffice to say so. They have
> a list on their front page at http://www.cyc.com/)

If you ask me, it's for AGI builders =)  Anyone can download it for their
own purposes, maybe with a fee.

YKY ________________________________
 This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email

To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to