Another way to group the data might be to tease it out into dimensions of what, where, when and whom. There does seem to be some neurological evidence for this kind of categorization. Also, by indexing the data along these lines it allows you to some extent to make meaningful interpolations from similar but non-identical situations, or to imagine situations which are vaguely plausible based upon your past experience.
On 14/01/07, YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/14/07, Chuck Esterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Would it support separate domains/modules? I didn't realize the importance of this point at first. Indeed, what we regard as common sense may be highly subjective as it involves matters such as human values, ideology or religion. So the differentiation of subsets is desirable. We may maintain a "core body" that is really uncontroversial (eg everyday physics), and then let users create their own personalities as additional modules / communities. YKY ------------------------------ This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
