Yes, and I could (and have) done that in various highly specific,
concrete scenarios as well.
That is one of the many major differences between narrow AI and AGI.
-- Ben
On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:04 PM, gts wrote:
Well, although I am not an AI developer, I am a C++ application
developer and I know I or any reasonably skilled developer could
write task-specific applications that would be extremely coherent
in the De Finetti sense (applicable to making probabilistic
judgements in horse-racing, casinos, the stockmarket, whatever).
These applications would make mincemeat of humans in any test of
coherence. Such applications already exist, come to think of it.
So I think people should be optimistic about coherence in AGI, not
pessimistic.
-gts
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
