On 2/25/07, Kevin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/26/07, Chuck Esterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But wouldn't it be difficult to integrate the results of the
> experimental copy back into the working copy which has since had new
> experiences, memory formation and lessons at the end of the time
> period for experimentation and/or optimization?
I don't see why. Any input into the duplicated module could be saved
during the time that subsystem is undergoing regularly scheduled
maintenance, then played back into the module at an accelerated rate
before swapping the optimized version back in.
That would work for a sleep process that is purely optimizing, but if
learning took place during the sleep operation then it seems that
would be problematic. The "new brain" might take different actions
based on the inputs which would then require subsequent inputs to be
different from the recorded ones (such as vision, communications from
others, etc.).
-Chuck
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
