On 3/12/07, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm still not quite sure if what I said came across clearly, because some of what you just said is so far away from what I intended that I have to make some kind of response.
Indeed it seems I'm still not understanding you... I thought I did deny that approach already: I explained that I was
doing a huge reengineering of the existing body of knowledge in cognitive science. Can you imagine how much structure there is in such a thing? There are roughly 1,000 human experiments or AI simulations accounted for in that structure, and all integrated in such a way that it implies one over system framework (at least, that is the goal of the project). That doesn't sound like Seed AI to me: it has both structure in its architecture, and it also allows for some priming of its knowledge base with 'hand-built' knowledge.
Is this huge structure intended to be part of/input to an AI program? If so, then it needs a machine-readable representation. Since it is to be built by humans, does that representation not also need to be human-readable? ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
