I appreciate the amount of effort you made in replying to my email.

Most of your questions would be answered if you read the documentation on my 
site.  The last time I looked, LISP had no built-in database.  Has this changed 
recently?  Does it still use that idiotic prefix notation?  My internal byte 
code uses just such a system but it is meant for a computer to read not a human.

I set out a list of attributes that I believed a language should have to create 
an AGI.  I found no SINGLE language that contained even a subset of those 
attributes.  I have spent a huge amount of time creating my system to it's 
current level but I would stop my development, today, if a single computer 
language could meet my original spec list.

I bought my first PC in 1976.  I have owned many different micro computer 
systems even before the PC was invented.  I helped design and program a PC from 
the ground up in 1979 including a muti-user CPM operating system that ran in 
64K of memory.  I worked on a Mac to convert a language/database program in 
1984.  I have used main frames, mini's and many non PC systems.  I have 
programmed in at least 30 computer languages and I have created more than a few 
myself.  I don't think I know everything about micros or languages but I am not 
a newbie or without PC experience.  Unlike most people that have had a long 
career, I have spent ALL my career (30+ years) using micro computers.

Linux stinks!  I have had my linux box at my right knee now for the past 6 
years and I can't wait to get rid of it.  I dislike the linux culture, the 
cryptic operating system commands, the massive number of versions and the buggy 
(free) code.  Six years ago, I bought over 1 foot high of documentation and 
taught myself Linux, VIM, Apache, PHP3, MySQL, HTML, and sendmail.  I had a 
commercial website up and running in 30 days that logged over 150k in sales in 
it's first 3 months without advertising.  It now is automatically updated and 
synchronized from my clients computer 600 miles away multi times a day.  You 
might not agree with my conclusions but I wanted you to know that my 
conclusions are based on first hand experience and not from books or third 
parties!

Most of the PC's in the world run Windows.  I personally don't much like 
Microsoft but with 95% of users using it, I think I'll stick with the crowd.  I 
dislike Mac and Linux much more.  That's just my professional opinion.

I have programmed my language in C++ but only the small amount of code that 
implements the IDE is actually not in portable C.  Very little of the 
non-standard or Windows specific functions were used in my code.  I do have 
plans to implement the language on Linux in the future but many other things 
are a higher priority.

"If your language is one OS dependent then it sucks from the beginning."

I guess this is your form of *constructive criticism*.  Thanks!

"You say you looked at different languages such as Lisp but your comments say 
you didn't really understand what you were looking at all."

What exact examples do you disagree with?  Do you think the examples I took 
verbatim from the official Lisp web site were made up?  Do YOU understand or do 
you just know the code words?

-- David Clark




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Samantha Atknis 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 3:37 PM
  Subject: Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda



  I think you are pretty much stark raving here. :-)   Linux is not cryptic 
compared to Windoze in the least.  I have worked with Window many, many times.  
When I have a Windows machine that I bought myself it inevitably gets converted 
to Linux within 6 months.  Usually this is after I have had to reinstall the OS 
at least once to fix the breakage that is the  Windows registry.  It IDEs for 
C/C++ are not bad if you don't mind having window-isms leak into every part of 
your code.  .Net is a step into much better direction but I can get most of 
that goodness under Mono and run on more platforms.   Windows GUI is not very 
good at all once you have lived on the Mac world for very long.  The Mac 
running OS X gives most of the advantages of Unix on a very visually 
well-designed system with excellent tools.  Windows is a disaster for hacking.  
Most of the nomal cli tools are utterly brain dead.  I always load cygwin and 
live under it as much as possible on windoze.  We want even get into the virus 
breeding idiocy that is Windows.  

  At the least go the Mac route.  That is my choice today for the most of the 
things I care about.  Especially now that I can easily run Linux and/or Windows 
when I need to in virtual machines (Parallels).   For many years I did not have 
any Windows machine and I had no trouble working just fine with the rest of the 
world.  What few Windows programs I needed ran fine under Wine or had quite 
useable alternatives. 

  If your language is one OS dependent then it sucks from the beginning.


  You say you looked at different languages such as Lisp but your comments say 
you didn't really understand what you were looking at at all. 

  - samantha




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
  To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303 

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to