Hi Ben,
  
 I understand the current situation with Novamente.  It seems that one 
fundamental difference between Cyc and Novamente is that Cyc is focused on the 
linguistic / symbolic level whereas Novamente is focused on sensory / 
experiential learning. 
  
 My current intuition is that Cyc's route may achieve "a certain level of 
intelligence" *sooner*.  (Although the work done with sensory-based AGI would 
probably still be useful.)  This may sound kind of vague, but my intuition is 
that if we invest on a Cyc-like AGI for 5 years, it may be able to converse 
with humans in a natural language and answer some commonsense queries (which, 
the current Cyc actually is somewhat capable of).  But if you invest 5 years in 
a sensory-based AGI, the resulting AGI baby may be still at the level of a 3-5 
years old human.  It seems that much of your work may be wasted on dealing with 
sensory processing and experiential learning, the latter is particularly 
inefficient. 
  
 The Cyc route actually bypasses experiential learning because it allows us to 
directly enter commonsense knowledge into its KB.  That is perhaps the most 
significant difference between these 2 approaches. 
  
 YKY
My first thought and gut-reaction was "Yeah" record all knowledge about all 
objects and things, and then you can build an AI on top of that.  The problem 
is you need a perfectly compiled, ready to use DB of information.  
  How do you tell its perfect?  Use it, test it, in all situations.  This is 
where Cyc fails most horribly unfortunatly :{
There is no real way to test all information in all situations, so any amount 
of Cyc's information is incorrect for some usage, so when the AI tries it it 
fails and must correct the information in some way.
  Now, I think we need a small core of knowledge, and abilities, wherin we can 
get a AI up on its feet and able to interact as soon as possible. Does it know 
everything, can can it do everything, no, but if you have a hosue robot, it 
really doesnt need to know about Paris, and cities in France, until it has 
reason to know it.
  If it has a rich ability to interact with its users, to ask questions, to get 
data from a simple source like Wikipedia or direct experience, then it has the 
ability of humans to learn.  

James Ratcliff



_______________________________________
James Ratcliff - http://falazar.com
Looking for something...
       
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936

Reply via email to