--- Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmmm... I think my point may have gotten lost in the confusion here. > > What I was trying to say was *suppose* I produced an AGI design that > used pretty much the same principles as those that operate in the human > cognitive system (non-determinism and all). > > Under those circumstances, your test would fail to classify it as an AGI > even though it clearly would be an AGI. > > Doesn't that make the test useless?
Only if you insist on using nondeterministic hardware. But why would you do that? > In particular I don't understand why you say: > > > I can give you 6 billion more examples that would fail... > > Are you trying to imply that humans are not good enough to qualify as > intelligent? No, only that humans can't compress. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
