On 4/27/07, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4/26/07, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Can you point to an objective definition that is clear about which
>>> things are more intelligent than others, and which does not
accidentally
>>> include things that manifestly conflict with the commonsense
definition
>>> (by false negatives or false positives)?
Wow. The silence was deafening after my last attempt . . . .
How about if I rephrase slightly dufferently as:
Intelligence is
the size of the space containing all world-states that the entity can
successfully reach
minus
the size of the space containing all world-states that the entity
cannot
successfully avoid.
I don't like this so much, because two sets of world-states with equal
measure (size) may have very different complexity...
ben g
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
