I think that a *solution to NLP* is not a *solution to AGI*, so your
argument does not apply.
I think that this depends upon your definition of intelligence and also
assumes that a solution to NLP is not enough to boostrap the rest. I could
argue the point either way. I think that NLP is difficult enough that it
will put you a huge way along the path to AGI (because, fundamentally,
language *requires* intelligence).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] rule-based NL system
On 4/28/07, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Disagree. The brain ALWAYS tries to make sense of language - convert it
into
images and graphics. I see no area of language comprehension where this
doesn't apply.
I think that a *solution to NLP* is not a *solution to AGI*, so your
argument does not apply. A solution to NLP is a module, with NL input
and two-way communication with the rest of the AGI, making the life
for the rest of AGI as simple as possible.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
