--- Lukasz Stafiniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/3/07, Benjamin Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Me neither. It gives you the means to define a grammar for English, > but > > > > conveniently leaves the hard part up to the user :-) > > > > > > > In next two months or so, we will change your impression without > > > changing the truth value of this statement ;-) > > > > > > > > > Wait... did the "this statement" in the statement prior to the current > > statement refer to the statement prior to the current statement or to the > > statement prior to that one ;-) > > Seriously: of the statement "It gives you the means to define a > grammar for English, but conveniently leaves the hard part up to the > user".
But how does Speagram resolve ambiguities like this one? ;-) -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
