--- Robert Wensman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe there is hope if computer scientists tries to be a little bit less > like mathematicians, and dares to let in a little bit of the psychological > vagueness in their paper writing jargon. By that I do not mean to encourage > any kind of Freud-like incoherent crackpot theories, but just the kind of > vagueness that is associated with any kind of complex engineering, like > "this system seems to be better than that system", or "it seems this design > could benefit a certain capability" etc. Maybe an increased focus on AGI > would encourage such a development.
Not necessarily. In my work I measure intelligence to 9 significant digits. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=48007049-e10a03
