Bob Mottram wrote:
On 04/10/2007, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As to exactly how, I don't know, but since the AGI is, by assumption,
peaceful, friendly and non-violent, it will do it in a peaceful,
friendly and non-violent manner.
This seems very vague. I would suggest that if there is no clear
mechanism for stopping someone from developing an AGI then such
enforcement will not occur in practice.
Oh, in my haste I forgot to remind you that this assumes RSI: the first
AGI to be built will undoubtedly be used to design faster and possibly
smarter forms of AGI, in a rapidly escalating process.
It is only under *those* assumptions that it will take action. It will
invent techniques to handle the situation. Nanotech, probably, but
perhaps lesser techniques will do.
Clearly, at the base level it will not be able to do anything, if it
doesn't have access to any effectors.
Richard Loosemore
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=49776231-a7ad14
