I read the paper -- nothing terribly interesting, but it does provide empirical validation that
a) it is quite possible to do a Turing Test type simulation with kids aged as young as 5 b) current AI programs (at least the chat bots they tried out in their experiment) can't pass this Turing test So it validates that a childrens' Turing Test starting at age 5 is not a stupid or unworkable idea. Of course, the extent to which is is a *valuable* idea is another story ... ;-) -- Ben G On Oct 29, 2007 11:06 AM, Benjamin Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone find that paper online for free, or email me a copy? > > thx > Ben Goertzel > > > On 10/29/07, Lukasz Stafiniak < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Perhaps related, haven't read it yet: > > > > Some Cognitive Aspects of a Turing Test for Children > > > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/w7572p14l7r4517n/?p=9c93cf27834c404fbddeab90b2234daf&pi=2 > > > > Probably, they tested children for humanhood (or adulthood?) using the > > Turing test... > > > > On 10/18/07, Benjamin Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > [for examples of conversation at this level, see the end of my post at > > > > > > > http://www.singinst.org/blog/2007/10/13/a-toddler-turing-test/#comment-8509 > > > ] > > > > > > > ----- > > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?& > > > > > > ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=59109938-ad39f2
