> Yeah - because "weak" AI is so simple. Why not just make some > run-of-the-mill narrow AI with a single goal of "Build AGI"? You can > just relax while it does all the work. >
I kind of like the idea of building software that then builds AGI. But you could say that that software is part of the AGI itself especially in an intelligence emergence generator type AGI. It depends on what code language the AGI is running in. C++ could host another language that is hosting the emerged AGI. The original c++ code could be written by some other c++ application instead of human coders. Another way is to read data from the real world and have that generate code. Stuff comes in and that is turned into c++ code based on its properties, behaviors, etc.. and that stuff is then integrated into the main engine. The main engine is just a very abstract system that aggregates, systematizes and housekeeps the real world's c++ "systems". So they come in as OOP mini applications and these are analyzed and categorized at the c++ semtactic level and then assimilated/integrated into the system's catagorizational internal framework/network. It's basically a form of continuous compilation AGI, you'd have processes and servers just compiling continuously while the thing is ripping apart, modifying, generating and compiling code. But yeah the trick is how well it modifies itself, the idea being it starts off simple thus maximizing the developer's relaxation time :) It can be evolutionary or it could follow other intelligent automata type pattern generative operative source-code expression and interaction. John ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=68498882-d93fe1
