On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 AM, Ed Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard, > > You are entitled to your reservations about OpenCog, but others, like me, > are entitled to our enthusiasms about it. > > You are correct that OpenCog starts with a certain approach, but I think it > is an approach that has a lot of promise, and if it has fatal limitations, > hopefully OpenCog will help us learn about them, so either the system can be > improved, or replaced by a better approach. > > If you have another approach, I wish you good luck with it. >
I can't be too enthusiastic about OpenCog yet because I know next to nothing about it, despite all these 'executive' publications and stray papers about Novamente. Let's wait and see. -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=79854254-d72e0c
