>>
In another message V. Nesov said:
Summarizing, you say that you might have proved P=NP, but don't give any
technical details, and there is God involved. It sounds really bad.
Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
================
Ok, I would agree with you on that much. But I would also be wondering if
there was any possibility that it was true.
At any rate, I should have a better idea if the idea will work or not by the
end of the year.
But do you think that that SAT is not in p? Why not? (By the way, I did not
say that p=np. I think wikipedia gives examples of problems in np by
definition. So if SAT and the equivalent problems are in p that does not mean
that anything in np is in p.)
Jim Bromer
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=86195092-8f4bce
