Yes, great presentation and summary of the work done by these guys at
CMU. It reinforces my belief that sensory processing should be
explained in terms of finding efficient representations, in other
words: dimensionality reduction. One nice aspect is that there are
machine learning techniques that do exactly this in a general way,
like(Restricted) Boltzmann Machines or adapted ICA. The wonderful
thing about this kind of architecture is that at the same time it
explains biological phenomena, and performs very well on computer
vision tasks like classification and clustering. I'm wondering how
much further one could extend such architecture to coding of
spatiotemporal (video) patterns, multimodal patterns (video + audio)
and eventually coding of 3D objects. They are all 'just' extensions of
such a model, 'just' about finding efficient ways of learning the
joint probability distributions :) however I imagine that finding
efficient ways of training such models (e.g. finding compact
representations) should become increasingly hard.

The 'ultimate' general computer vision architecture, in my mind, would
be series of (stereo) images as input, learns such a hierarchical
model (using dimensionality reduction) and uses this to interpret the
images, and in parallel uses this 2D/2.5D interpretation (plus
disparity information) to create a full dynamical 3D mapping of its
environment, which in term could be subject to further interpretation
(dimensionality reduction).
A huge task :) But, increasingly realistic.

This, then, of course, could be used by e.g. Novamente to step out of
the virtual realm and perform inference in the real world. And that's
where the fun would start, don't you all agree?

On Feb 17, 2008 3:16 PM, Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/02/2008, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a tutorial talk I saw recently (see Section A):
> > http://nips.cc/Conferences/2007/Program/event.php?ID=577
> > Michael Lewicki
> > Sensory Coding and Hierarchical Representations
>
> I like this guy's approach, which covers many familiar topics.
> Particularly I liked the way he treated both vision and auditory
> systems as essentially the same problem.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to