On 2/21/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Feeding all the ambiguous interpretations of a load of sentences into
> a probabilistic
> logic network, and letting them get resolved by reference to each
> other, is a sort of
> "search for the most likely solution of a huge system of simultaneous
> equations" ...
> i.e. one needs to let each, of a huge set of ambiguities, be resolved
> by the other ones...
>
> This is not an easy problem, but it's not on the face of it unsolvable...
>
> But I think the solution will be easier with info from direct
> experience to nudge the
> process in the right direction...

Excellent analogy, I'd like to work on such a system =)

Note that it's not just ambiguities that need to be resolved;  some facts
need to be "explained away", for example, water may uphill because of some
abnormal conditions.  The system needs to be able to find explanations for
things...

YKY

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to