On 04/03/2008, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> But the question is whether the internal knowledge representation of > the AGI needs to allow ambiguities, or should we use an ambiguity-free > representation. It seems that the latter choice is better. > > An excellent point. But what if the representation is natural language > with pointers to the specific intended meaning of any words that are > possibly ambiguous? That would seem to be the best of both worlds. >
This is fine provided that the AGI lives inside a chess-like ambiguity free world, which could be a simulation or maybe some abstract data mining environment. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
