Chess is a typical example of a very hard problem where human level
intelligence

could be outperformed by typical AI programs when they have enough computing
power available.

But a chess program is no AGI program because it is restricted to a very
narrow well defined problem and environment.

 

On the other hand, if there is a program which has human level intelligence,
then we would say that this program is an AGI program.

 

Both examples are extreme examples and I wonder where people in this mailing
list see  the necessary conditions of AGI.

 

On the one hand, one can try to describe this formally. But I would like to
find comparisons with animal like intelligence.

 

My question:

 

Which animal has the smallest level of intelligence which still would be
sufficient for a robot to  be an AGI-robot? 




-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=106510220-47b225
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to