On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Russell Wallace
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Russell Wallace
>>> Indeed, but becoming more efficient at processing evidence is
>>> something that requires being embedded in the environment to which the
>>> evidence pertains.
>>
>> Why is that?
>
> For the reason I explained earlier. Suppose program A generates
> candidate programs B1, B2... that are conjectured to be more efficient
> at processing evidence. It can't just compare their processing of
> evidence with the correct version, because if it knew the correct
> results in all cases, it would already be that efficient itself. It
> has to try them out.
>

But it can just work with a static corpus. When you need to figure out
efficient learning, you only need to know a little about the overall
structure of your data (which can be described by a reasonably small
number of exemplars), you don't need much of the data itself.

-- 
Vladimir Nesov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=106510220-47b225
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to