The other thing about an embodied perspective is that I have a hunch it may be necessary to understand even inanimate matter from a scientific and not just a personal perspective. (I mention this in case there are any physicists/chemists around who care to comment). IOW we won't understand how matter coheres in its myriad, diverse forms - if we don't understand water, gases etc as *integral wholes* and not just assemblies of pieces.

The great deficiency of our mechanistic worldview, in its current simplistic form, is that machines are artificial assemblies of parts, and so science tends to view all things similarly. But actually natural things and organisms are integral wholes, "naturally assembled" and in that way fundamentally different. .



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to