> > > > > I mean assumptions like "symmetric treatment of intension and extension", > > which are technical mathematical assumptions... > > But they are still not assumptions about domain knowledge, like node > probability. >
Well, in PLN the balance between intensional and extensional knowledge is calculated based on domain knowledge, in each case... So, from a PLN view, this symmetry assumption of NARS's **is** effectively an assumption about domain knowledge What constitutes domain knowledge, versus an a priori assumption, is not very clear really... the distinction seems to be theory-laden and dependent on the semantics of the inference system in question... ben g ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
